2017 UCERF Workshop
Conveners: Ned Field and the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities
Dates: April 3 - 6, 2017
Location: USGS Powell Center, Fort Collins, CO
SCEC Award and Report: 17091
SUMMARY: The ongoing WGCEP has developed and published a full OEF model for California, known as UCERF3-ETAS. At the same time progress has been made with respect improving the relatively simple aftershock notifications issued by the USGS for other parts of the world. This meeting will involve a comprehensive review of these capabilities, including examination of the scientific underpinnings as well as the potential usefulness. With respect to the latter, several potential early adopters will be in attendance in order to articulate potential use cases and their perceived value. Given the significant resources needed for further operationalization, the goal of this meeting is to provide guidance to the USGS on what level of effort should be put into developing these capabilities.
Questions for Reviewers
- Should the USGS replace Reasenberg-Jones models with ETAS models to quantify aftershock probabilities?
- Should the USGS use the fault-based UCERF3-ETAS model in quantifying short-term earthquake probabilities in California?
- What type of testing is necessary and sufficient to qualify a short-term earthquake forecast model for general operational use or use in specific applications?
- Given the state of earthquake science and the potential utility of short-term forecasting, what level of effort should the USGS put into OEF?
Questions for Potential Users
- What hazard or risk metrics (e.g., Table 1) you are concerned about?
- What gains (increase relative to long-term risk) would you find actionable?
- What timeframes are you interested in (because gains decay with time)?
- Can you put a value on this information to you and/or your clients?
Table 1. List of various OEF hazard and risk products.
Potential OEF Products | |
1) Magnitude Probability Distribution | Probability of one or more events vs magnitude for specified region and timespan |
2) Magnitude Probability Map | Spatial distribution for events exceeding specified magnitude for timespan |
3) Hazard Curve | Probability that an intensity measure type (e.g. MMI, PGA, PGV, etc.) will exceed various values at a specified location and for a specified timespan |
4) Hazard Map | Spatial probability that an intensity measure type (e.g. MMI, PGA, etc.) will exceed a specified value over a specified timespan |
5) Loss Exceedance Curve | Probability that loss will exceed various values over a specified timespan |
6) Loss Exceedance Map | Spatial distribution of loss exceedance probability for a specified value and timespan |
7) Fault participation probability | List or map for a chosen timespan. |
8) Gains for 1-7 above | Relative to long-term or pre-event conditions |
9) Stochastic event sets | Synthetic catalogs of events, possibly including finite-rupture surface information |
10) Example aftershock scenanrio events | e.g. ShakeMap, PAGER, and/or ShakeCast products for one or more events that might occur |
- Short Paper (Subm. to SRL)
- Long Paper (BSSA)
- Loss-Modeling Paper (Subm. to Earthquake Spectra)
MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2017 - Best Available Science for OEF
07:00 - 08:00 | Breakfast | |
08:00 - 10:00 | Session1 | |
Powell Center Welcome & Logistics | Jill Baron & Leah Colasuonno | |
Workshop Goals & Self-Introduction | Ned Field | |
Current Issues with OEF | Tom Jordan | |
Brief history of OEF at the USGS and Near-Term Goals | Jeanne Hardebeck | |
The Case of ETAS | Andy Michael | |
10:00-10:10 | Break | |
Progress on ETAS Implementation and Products | Nicolas van der Elst | |
Applicability of ETAS to Swarms & Induced Seismicity | Andrea Llenos | |
UCERF3-ETAS | Ned Field | |
12:00 - 01:00 | Lunch | |
01:00 - 03:00 | Session2 | |
UCERF3-ETAS continued | Ned Field | |
Testing UCERF3-ETAS | Morgan Page | |
03:00 - 03:10 | Break | |
03:10 - 05:00 | Session3 | |
Can Physics-Based Simulators Help? | Bruce Shaw | |
Discussion on Necessary and Sufficient Tests for OEF Models | Max Werner | |
General Discussion |
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 2017 - OEF Use Cases and Valuation
07:00 - 08:00 | Breakfast | |
08:00 - 12:00 | Session1 | |
Introduction (& Examples Via U3ETAS-Impled Statewide Losses) | Ned Field | |
Experiences in Italy | Warner Marzocchi | |
Experiences in New Zealand | Matt Gerstenberger & Anne Wein | |
NEPEC and CEPEC Procedures in Light of OEF Developments | Mike Blanpied & John Parrish | |
CalOES Perspective | Kate Long | |
FEMA Perspective | Sean McGowan | |
Post-Earthquake Building Tagging | Nico Luco | |
Bank and Utility Perspective | Keith Porter | |
PG&E (Utility) Perspective | Katie Wooddell | |
Caltrans Perspective | Loren Turner | |
12:00 - 01:00 | Lunch | |
01:00 - 05:00 | Session2 | |
California Earthquake Authority (Insurance) Perspectice | Shawna Ackerman | |
Commercial Loss Modeling Perspective | Ken Campbell | |
Commercial Loss Modeling Perspective | Nilesh Shome | |
OEF in the Insurance Community | Guillermo Franco (Presented by Nilesh Shome) | |
One Concern (http://www.oneconcern.com) Perspective | Abhineet Gupta | |
Use of Induced Seismicity Models | Mark Petersen | |
East Bay Municipal Utility District | Andrea Chen (Presented by Anne Wein) | |
Time remaining | General Discussion | Bruce Shaw |
PARTICIPANTS
Ralph Archuleta (UCSB)
Greg Beroza (Stanford)
Michael Blanpied (USGS, Reston)
Roland Burgmann (UC Berkeley)
Jordan Burns (FEMA)
Ken Campbell (CoreLogic)
Rui Chen (CGS)
Ned Field (USGS, Golden)
Cliff Frohlich (U of Texas)
Matt Gerstenberger (GNS New Zealand)
Jacquelyn Gilchrist (USC)
Christine Goulet (USC)
Abineet Gupta (OneConcern)
Jeanne Hardebeck (USGS, Menlo)
Steve Hickman (USGS, Menlo)
Thomas Jordan (USC)
Andrea Llenos (USGS, Menlo)
Kate Long (CalOES)
Nico Luco (USGS, Golden)
Warner Marzocchi (IGNV, Italy)
Jill McCarthy (USGS, Golden)
Andrew Michael (USGS, Menlo)
Kevin Milner (USC)
Morgan Page (USGS, Pasadena)
John Parrish (CGS)
Mark Petersen (USGS, Golden)
Keith Porter (CU, Bolder)
Evelyn Roeloffs (USGS, Vancouver)
Jess Rozelle (FEMA)
Katherine Scharer (USGS, Pasadena)
Bruce Shaw (LDEO)
Nilesh Shome (RMS)
Terry Tullis (Brown University)
Loren Turner (Caltrans)
Nicholas van der Elst (Mendehall Postdoc)
Anne Wein (USGS, Menlo)
Maximilian Werner (U. Bristol)
Katie Wooddell (PG&E)
Not in Attendance:
Craig Davis (LADWP)
Guillermo Franco (Guy Carpenter)
Sean McGowan (FEMA)
Jaesung Park (Nephila Advisors LLC)
It is SCEC policy to foster harassment-free environments wherever our science is conducted. By accepting an invitation to participate in a SCEC-supported event, by email or online registration, participants agree to abide by the SCEC Activities Code of Conduct.